In this context, storing such monitored systems would be essential to avoid easy identification. Therefore either there needs to be obscure hierarchy of client checks, or some communication from the client that, if tampered, can prompt server side intervention. But some features are not accessible from the server side. Besides, in hopping backwards and forwards, the position and orientation of the limb changes, how, if its based on the user camera, do we extrapolate the “same visual position” of the limb?Ĥ is a question of server-client relation, from my understanding the consensus is to NEVER trust the client with anything that can effect other players. If the target is stationary, it makes hitting the same position of the same limb easier, if both parties are stationary, this makes it, nigh on certain, as long as you have a steady hand. However, a fix to this is to use another ray to pinpoint the point that the cursor is at, as well as the part the cursor is aiming at, and pass this as another element to the RemoteEvent, and use this instead.ģ, is the killer issue. If a gun uses a spread mechanic, issues 1 and 2 this could be troublesome. (Note, this is only if the checks are server side) It is going towards the same position as the last shot. While this, at first, seems like a good system, it relies on 4 things: Server: Hold up! this was the same part, at the same position. Server: Okayyyy, you hit the same part, at the same position, dont do this again.
Server: Cool, seems alright to me, your previous shot is not the same part.Ĭlient: I fired a gun again, this is the part I want to damage and this is my bullet end. This is an example of the logic:Ĭlient: I fired a gun, this is the player part I want to damage and this is my bullet end relative to the player part. This could be identified by having the origin, the target, and the player that is being shot, be part of the RemoteEvent. Does the mouse consistently keep homed in on a players body part while moving? I mean, I’m no pro-aimed shooter, but I’d say keeping a constant aim on a body part while bunnyhopping or moving a bit fishy. This can be relatively easy to pick up by a check. It can be assumed, therefore, that the aimbot is not an exterior weapons system and thus, with some server side checking of client items, it could be possible to prevent an aimbot.įrom what I have seen, the use of aimbot manipulates either the camera, in first person games, or the cursor in 3rd person games. Now, one of my lines of thought was, how do they work? They only seem to apply once a tool or weapon is equipped, as from videos I have seen it use the in-game systems. But it then becomes a battle of aimbots and not a fun or engaging fight, this is arguably one reason war clans have stagnated. And it’s understandable, you want to win, you ensure a way of winning. This thought was sparked personally, by experiencing how widespread such programs are in the Clans Community.
This is theory that may help developers consider ways to avoid aimbotting on their games. So, I’ve been doing a bit of brainstorming about possible theory about the prevention of aimbot programs.
0 kommentar(er)
